<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take a load off Annie, take a load for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?p=5</link>
	<description>...domestic realism and pensive coffee-drinking...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?p=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description>There are albums that one gets to know anew, and more deeply, through the new technology.  And songs.

It&#039;s funny you should mention Horses.  A couple of months ago, we each bought a 1g IRiver to share time with the 20g.  For my (bright orange) 1g, I went through the collection and pulled essential tracks - tracks such that I could have on shuffle and listen to while walking to work or waiting for the bus or whatever and never have to shuffle past something.  It&#039;s been a long process of trial and tweaking, but I think I&#039;ve got it down.

One of the tracks that has ended up being part of that walkin&#039; jukebox is, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, the Land triptych (horses/land.../la mer).  I don&#039;t know why I drop it on there, but I can&#039;t express the power that track has over me, the intense surge I get from it.  Maybe you can relate (a quick check of the dates shows me some 30 years late arriving to this particular party).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are albums that one gets to know anew, and more deeply, through the new technology.  And songs.</p>
<p>It&#039;s funny you should mention Horses.  A couple of months ago, we each bought a 1g IRiver to share time with the 20g.  For my (bright orange) 1g, I went through the collection and pulled essential tracks &#8211; tracks such that I could have on shuffle and listen to while walking to work or waiting for the bus or whatever and never have to shuffle past something.  It&#039;s been a long process of trial and tweaking, but I think I&#039;ve got it down.</p>
<p>One of the tracks that has ended up being part of that walkin&#039; jukebox is, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, the Land triptych (horses/land&#8230;/la mer).  I don&#039;t know why I drop it on there, but I can&#039;t express the power that track has over me, the intense surge I get from it.  Maybe you can relate (a quick check of the dates shows me some 30 years late arriving to this particular party).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caryn</title>
		<link>http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>caryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertjwiersema.com/blog/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t actually need to listen to albums I know as well as these.&quot;

So odd in appearance, but so very true. This became a little less true for me once I got my iPod four years ago, when I loaded what I considered to be my core library onto the iPod, and was suddenly hearing deep tracks from, say, &quot;Sandinista&quot; that I probably hadn&#039;t heard in 20 years, and the albums I kept hearing that I didn&#039;t need to hear (if that makes sense) so I finally took them off the iPod.

And now the iPod is primarily about new music and stuff I feel like I have to have with me at any given time, which changes and shifts.  But I don&#039;t need to have &quot;Who&#039;s Next&quot; or &quot;No Code&quot; or &quot;Horses&quot; on the iPod, always, because I don&#039;t need to hear them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;I don’t actually need to listen to albums I know as well as these.&#034;</p>
<p>So odd in appearance, but so very true. This became a little less true for me once I got my iPod four years ago, when I loaded what I considered to be my core library onto the iPod, and was suddenly hearing deep tracks from, say, &#034;Sandinista&#034; that I probably hadn&#039;t heard in 20 years, and the albums I kept hearing that I didn&#039;t need to hear (if that makes sense) so I finally took them off the iPod.</p>
<p>And now the iPod is primarily about new music and stuff I feel like I have to have with me at any given time, which changes and shifts.  But I don&#039;t need to have &#034;Who&#039;s Next&#034; or &#034;No Code&#034; or &#034;Horses&#034; on the iPod, always, because I don&#039;t need to hear them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
